Designing a Chabad house with the Rabbi, the board, and the donors in the room

Every Chabad house project has three rooms in it before a single wall is drawn. There is the vision in the Shliach’s head, built from years of Shabbos tables that outgrew the dining room. There is the board’s spreadsheet, where the vision meets governance, insurance, and a budget. And there is the donor’s question, asked politely at a parlor meeting: what exactly am I funding? A successful building process is the art of getting those three rooms to agree — and the design itself is the instrument of agreement.
HH Designers has designed more Chabad houses than any other interior design firm. What follows is the process we have refined across those projects for aligning Rabbi, board, and donors without grinding the mission to a halt.
Start with the program, not the building
The first meeting is never about square footage. It is about the calendar: what happens in this building on a regular Tuesday, on Shabbos, on Purim, during the Pesach rush, at a bar mitzvah, on the night a donor is honored. We map the real weekly and annual rhythm of the Chabad house — meals, minyanim, classes, youth programs, women’s events, holiday surges — and let the building emerge from the program. When the board sees the program documented, budget conversations change: square footage stops being an abstraction and becomes Tuesday night.

Fix the halachic requirements first
The fastest way to lose a year is to let halachic requirements surface mid-design. We put them on the table in week one as fixed constraints: the mikvah and its construction requirements, the kosher kitchen’s separations, the mechitzah, the orientation of the aron kodesh. Boards respect constraints that are named early and explained clearly; what breeds friction is discovering them after the concept everyone loved turns out to be unbuildable. With the non-negotiables fixed, everything else becomes a genuine choice — and choices are where boards do their best work.
Talk this through with the studio — no pressure, straight answers.
Renderings are fundraising infrastructure
A capital campaign runs on images. Long before construction documents exist, we produce photorealistic renderings of the spaces donors care most about: the main hall set for Shabbos, the children’s wing, the entry with the community’s name in it. These renderings do three jobs at once. They give the Shliach something to show at every parlor meeting. They give the campaign committee a consistent visual identity for brochures and pledge cards. And they quietly resolve design debates — it is much easier to agree on a room you can see. Our rendering practice exists in large part because of what it does for community campaigns.
Design naming opportunities into the architecture
Naming is not signage bolted on at the end; it is a design layer. A campaign needs a ladder of opportunities — the building, the hall, the kitchen, the library, the mikvah suite, individual classrooms, even the coat room — and each needs a moment in the architecture where recognition feels dignified rather than transactional. We design donor walls, dedication moments, and material palettes that make a name look like it belongs. When the campaign committee can hand a donor a rendering with their family’s name already set into the limestone, conversations close.

Phase the building to match the campaign
Most communities cannot fund the full vision on day one, and pretending otherwise produces buildings that stall at the framing stage. We design the complete master plan first, then cut it into phases that track realistic fundraising: the social hall and catering kitchen that generate momentum and revenue first, the sanctuary or mikvah next, education wing after. The discipline is making each phase feel finished — a community should never daven in a building that apologizes for itself — while power, plumbing, and structure quietly wait for the next phase. Donors respond to master plans: they can see where their gift sits in something larger.
Give the board what boards need
Boards move on documentation. We produce budgets tied to drawings, finish schedules with real alternates priced, and a Spec Book that lets multiple contractors bid the same scope. That transparency is not bureaucracy — it is how a volunteer board says yes with confidence, and how the Shliach avoids being personally blamed for every change order. Our process gives the committee scheduled decision points instead of an open-ended stream of questions.
Protect the warmth
The quiet danger in any committee-driven project is that the building becomes an institution. A Chabad house is a home first — that is the entire point of the model — and warmth is the design requirement least likely to have a advocate in a budget meeting. It is our job to be that advocate: the residential-scale lighting, the dining room that feels like a family table even at sixty settings, the multipurpose room that turns institutional efficiency into hospitality. Boards fund buildings; communities return to homes.
If your community is somewhere between a vision and a campaign, we have sat at that table many times. See our Chabad house design practice and built examples, or start the conversation whenever you are ready.
Selected work
Projects from the studio related to this article.

Ready to put these ideas to work?
A quick, no-pressure conversation about your project, your budget, and what it will take to build it right.

Talk this through with the studio — no pressure, straight answers.
Frequently asked
questions.
Who should be involved in a Chabad house design process?
The working group is usually the Shliach and Rebbetzin, a small building committee drawn from the board, and the lead donors funding the campaign. We structure the process so each group weighs in at the right moments: the Shluchim on program and daily function, the committee on budget and governance, the donors on vision and legacy. What we avoid is a fifteen-person committee reviewing paint colors — that is how projects stall and warmth gets value-engineered away.
How do renderings help a Chabad building campaign raise money?
Donors fund what they can see. A photorealistic rendering of the new main hall filled with light — with the donor wall visible and the community implied at the table — converts an abstract ask into a concrete legacy. We routinely produce campaign-ready renderings early, before full documentation, precisely so the Shliach can walk into a parlor meeting with images instead of floor plans. Campaigns with strong visuals consistently outraise campaigns with blueprints.
How do you handle disagreements between the Rabbi and the board?
By separating the negotiable from the non-negotiable early. Halachic requirements — the mikvah, the kosher kitchen, the mechitzah, the orientation of the aron — are documented as fixed constraints in the first meeting, so they are never bargaining chips. Everything else is a design decision with options, and options are how consensus gets built: we present two or three developed directions with real costs attached, and disagreements become choices instead of standoffs.
Can a Chabad house be built in phases as funds are raised?
Yes, and it usually should be. We design the full-buildout vision first, then draw phase lines that follow the capital campaign: perhaps the social hall and kitchen first, the mikvah second, classrooms third. Each phase is designed to feel complete on its own — no exposed stubs, no obviously missing wing — while the infrastructure quietly anticipates what comes next. Donors see a master plan they can attach names to, and the community never occupies a construction site.
What makes HH Designers different for Chabad projects?
Repetition. HH Designers has designed more Chabad houses than any other interior design firm, from the Berkshires to St. Petersburg to campus Chabad at Vanderbilt. We know the program before the first meeting — the Shabbos dinner for sixty that becomes High Holidays for three hundred, the kitchen that is really a catering operation, the residence upstairs, the multipurpose room that never stops working. That fluency shortens design, prevents expensive relearning, and shows donors their money is in experienced hands.



